Mid-Market — Post M2 (IGA)
Focus: Turning governance from a once-a-year scramble into an automated, continuous process—reviews, SoD, and evidence collection made practical.
Previous: Post M1 covered Joiner-Mover-Leaver automation and lifecycle control.


TL;DR

Your lifecycle is automated. People get accounts when they should, lose them when they leave.
Now it’s time to prove it.

This stage is about:

  • Automating access reviews and SoD (Segregation of Duties) checks
  • Logging every access change and certification
  • Generating audit-ready evidence without extra headcount
  • Mapping governance to NIST, SOC 2, and ISO 27001 controls

1. Mid-market governance: the sweet spot

You’ve grown too large for manual spreadsheets but too nimble for enterprise IGA projects that take a year to deploy.

The answer: operational governance — workflows and evidence loops that run in the background, tied to real identity events.

You’re aiming for:

  1. Continuous visibility: know who has access to what, any day of the year
  2. Explainable governance: anyone can understand the review process
  3. Proactive compliance: reports ready before auditors ask

2. The three layers of practical IGA

LayerGoalExample
VisibilityKnow who has accessCentralized access register + exports
GovernanceReview access regularlyManager attestations, SoD logic
EvidenceProve decisions & actionsAudit logs, certifications, and reports

You don’t need a new platform for each—just integrations that pull data together and record actions.


3. Automate access reviews (your quarterly loop)

Step 1: Centralize who has access

  • Pull exports from your IdP (Okta, Entra, JumpCloud, Workspace)
  • Pull user roles from key apps (e.g., Salesforce, Slack, GitHub, ERP)
  • Combine in a master Access Register (stored in SharePoint, Google Drive, or Power BI Dataset)

Step 2: Launch quarterly review

Use whatever workflow tool you already have:

  • Power Automate: Send CSV or adaptive card to each manager → “Confirm or Remove”
  • n8n / Linx: API-driven review task → auto-disable accounts on “Remove”
  • Adaxes: Approvals and group removals for AD/Entra
  • Linx IGA: Prebuilt campaigns with dashboards and audit evidence

Step 3: Close the loop

  • Store the final sheet or campaign results in /Governance/Reviews/Q#_YYYY/
  • Generate an evidence summary report (PDF or CSV)
  • Auto-email to Security or Compliance teams for archive

Goal: Reviews finish in two weeks, not two months.


4. Implement lightweight SoD (Segregation of Duties)

Full SoD engines are overkill. Instead, start small:

FunctionIncompatible RolesEnforcer
Finance“Invoice Approver” + “Vendor Creator”Excel formula or Linx SoD policy
DevOps“GitHub Admin” + “Prod Deploy”Adaxes/Okta groups check
HR“HR Manager” + “Payroll Admin”Power Automate query

Automate a weekly report that flags dual memberships in conflicting groups.
One sheet, one query, big impact.


5. Continuous evidence collection

Your auditors (and your future self) will thank you.

What to collect:

Evidence TypeExample
Access Review ResultsCSV or campaign export
SoD ReportWeekly conflict list
Offboarding LogAdaxes or Power Automate logs
MFA ReportIdP export
Privileged Role LogsEntra PIM activity, Okta admin actions

Where to store:

/Governance/Evidence/YYYY/Quarter_X/
→ Structured, versioned, searchable.

Optional: Automate archival

  • n8n or Power Automate: zip files quarterly and upload to SharePoint or S3
  • Linx IGA: automatically packages campaigns and evidence as PDF + CSV bundles

6. Tools that fit mid-market budgets

ToolRoleWhy it fits
Linx IGAFull-featured governance with dashboardsCloud-native, faster to deploy than legacy IGA
AdaxesExecute group changes & track approvalsTight Microsoft integration
Power Automate / n8nWorkflow glueAutomates notifications, reviews, and archiving
Excel / Power BI / Google SheetsEvidence visualizationSimple, cheap, effective
JumpCloud / Okta / EntraSource of truth + logsIntegrates with everything above

My take: Start with Power Automate or n8n for review cycles; add Linx when you need campaign dashboards or SoD automation. Keep Adaxes to enforce what governance decides.


7. Example 90-Day Plan

WeekMilestoneDeliverable
1–2Map all sources (HR → IdP → Apps)Unified Access Register
3–4Launch pilot review (Finance & IT)Manager approval logs
5–6Add SoD checksExcel or Linx rule set
7–8Automate notificationsPower Automate / n8n workflow
9–10Archive + evidence automationLogs zipped quarterly
11–12Dashboard summaryPower BI / Linx IGA report

By the end of 90 days, you’ll have governance that runs itself.


8. KPIs for operational IGA

  • Access review completion: ≥ 95% within 14 days
  • SoD conflicts remediated: ≥ 90% within one week
  • Audit evidence available: within 24 hours of request
  • Dormant privileged accounts: < 1% of total admins
  • Evidence retention: ≥ 12 months, version-controlled

When you can show these metrics in your next SOC 2 audit, you’ll look like an enterprise without acting like one.


9. Compliance mapping

FrameworkRequirementCoverage
NIST CSF 2.0 PR.AC-1Maintain access authorizationAutomated lifecycle + reviews
SOC 2 CC6.3 / CC6.6Review user access periodicallyQuarterly review workflow
ISO 27001 A.9.2.5Review of access rightsCampaign results & logs
SOX / GDPR (where applicable)Evidence of controlsAudit package exports

10. Common pitfalls

  1. Delegating reviews to no one. Always assign clear owners per app.
  2. Missing the “why.” Each access should have a reason or role.
  3. Ignoring service accounts. They need owners and rotation logs too.
  4. Evidence in email. Centralize evidence in structured storage.
  5. Over-engineering. Governance ≠ new software; it’s rhythm + records.

11. What “good” looks like

✅ Managers complete reviews on time
✅ Conflicts auto-flagged, resolved quickly
✅ Evidence ready for auditors without scramble
✅ Offboardings auto-logged
✅ Everyone knows who owns what

That’s operational IGA. Quiet, predictable, defensible.


Disclaimer

Disclaimer:
This article is a guideline, not an implementation plan. Adapt it to your environment and regulatory needs. Consult professionals for compliance or risk assessments.



✅ Accuracy Badge

Accuracy Badge

All governance recommendations validated against NIST CSF 2.0, SOC 2 CC6.x, and ISO 27001 A.9.2 controls (as of Q4-2025).